Education is a kind of continuing dialogue, and a dialogue assumes, in the nature of the case, different points of view.
Robert Hutchins 1899-1977

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Why is style important in my current and/or future workplace?

From a fundamental standpoint, style is important to my profession because I am expected to teach "it" to my students. As a professor of developmental English, I encounter a population with a vast array of styles which I am expected to reign in and shape into Standard American English. Since accepted style stems more from economic strength and geographic location (Williams 13), this goal can be lofty as this population typically lacks financial prosperity and resides in areas where traditionally accepted language is infrequently used. The ultimate educational goal is that by the time they leave my classroom, they should know the rules of SAE and readily apply them to their future writing assignments. But a traditional approach to style can lead to dry, formulaic writing.

A more crucial reason for style's importance in the classroom is to assist students in finding their voice within the confines of the rules of academic style. Most of my students realize they lack the ability to "fit" or "blend in" to an academic or business environment resulting from non-standard verbal and writing skills. Although certain conventions are required for acceptance into most professional settings (and I don't have a problem with these conventions), I think it is imperative that these students understand that another part of style is intangible; it is their essence--their ideas. Sentence structure, punctuation, and usage are important, but how students use these tools to express their own unique ideas is at least equally important, if not more so.

So my personal understanding of style and its importance to writing and individual expression is central to providing my students with the maximum opportunity for growth and success.

5 comments:

  1. Deb, I loved your comment: "Sentence structure, punctuation, and usage are important, but how students use these tools to express their own unique ideas is at least equally important, if not more so."

    Like you, I work with students learning first-year-composition skills. It is indeed critical to respect the unique insights of our students; at the same time, Williams' suggestion that "learning to write clearly can help us think and feel and see" (14) encapsulates how our work broadens our students' worldview.

    Great post!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey, Deb, I really like your comment about the intangible part of style. This is important. I think the best uses of style are invisible to the reader. When those style issues are violated, that's when we notice them the most. It seems a little unfair that when we make great stylistic choices, they may go unnoticed. :)

    Thanks for your thougts.
    ~Rhonda

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cool post, Deb. I especially like your thoughts on how technology influences style. I wish I had read your ideas earlier, in fact, to influence my own response to the question! I think you're spot on about how technology influences the styles that are acceptable. The technology of texting is such that mispelling, emoticons, acronyms, etc. are more acceptable than in other mediums. Sometimes I get an email full of spelling errors and curt statements, and then see the 'Sent from my iPhone' disclaimer. "Ohhhhh, no wonder! Well then, that's alright," I think to myself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I too like the comment about the intangible part of style. A paper can be grammatically correct but can still manage to feel awkward.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Deb--

    I never thought about the connection between Style and Voice. That's very interesting pedagogically because I can see the relationship is not an easy one to establish in some digital writing spaces, where my classes devote much time to exploration and invention. I am considering some of the reading here, especially when Baron discusses how McLuhan was partially right about the medium being the message. In other words, I can see how voice can be intangible but can also altered by technology. That is, a smiley face added to an email changes the inflection of the passage. Depending on the smiley face, the writer means to be tongue-in-cheek or means to be sarcastic, etc. Can a smiley face be considered punctuation depending on the medium? I oftentimes wonder if the symbol is appropriate writing or should be corrected (to make the words sarcastic rather than using a symbol to denote the inflection of voice).

    Thanks for the blog--I enjoyed it!

    Ben

    ReplyDelete